THOUGHT FOR THE DAY!
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." -- Samuel Adams
YOUR RANDOM DHS MONITORED PHRASE OF THE DAY
The Right To Keep And Bear Arms - Student EssayBy Anonymous 14-yr old writing her essay for 8th grade English class
In 1791, the founders of the United States wrote, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." This is the Second Amendment, guaranteeing American citizens the right to self-protection and safety. Society is safer when people carry guns because it gives citizens the ability to protect themselves from threats like criminals, such as violent intruders and attackers, as well as violent shooters.
People should be able to carry firearms because your most fundamental right is your right to defend your life, and guns help secure that. More than 200 years ago, our founding fathers wrote the Second Amendment, guaranteeing that, "The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Even the founding fathers understood that having the means to defend yourself was necessary as a part of a free society. In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment specifically protects Americans' right to own a handgun for protection. This means that any American citizen has the right to defend themselves. Wayne Lapierre, the Chief Executive Officer of the National Rifle Association (N.R.A.) stated,"Self-defense is our birthright. Firearms secure that birthright." Everyone has the right to defend themselves, and guns help protect that right.
For example, guns make women safer by allowing them to defend themselves from violent attackers. Armed with a gun, a woman can have advantage over any attacker. Armed women can protect themselves from attackers and fight back without a chance of getting hurt. The article, Testimony of Gayle S. Trotter, admitted that, "Over 90% of violent crimes occur without a firearm." This is because attackers use their size and physical strength to prey on women who are at a severe disadvantage. Since most violent attackers don't use guns, an armed woman has a great advantage over her assailant, making guns the great equalizer. Some people say that there are other ways women can defend themselves without using a gun. One example is mace, or pepper spray. However, a woman armed with mace would need the proximity of a hand-to-hand struggle, which would not be necessary if she had a firearm. Therefore, guns are a more reliable means of defense. To take a case in point, a woman from Dora, Alabama, who defended herself and her family against a 25-year-old intruder in her home with a firearm says, "There's so much talk about banning guns and gun control, but they're for protection. There was no way I could have fought him off." Guns keep women safe by giving them a means to defend themselves.
It is most important to understand that gun-control laws take away the protection of the people by disarming only the law-abiding citizens. The article, Testimony of Gayle S. Trotter, says, "Anti-gun legislation keeps guns away from the sane and law-abiding, but it does not keep guns out of the hands of criminals." This is because gun regulation affects only the guns of the law-abiding. Criminals will not be bound by such gestures because criminals don't listen to the law. More than 20,000 anti-gun laws are in effect throughout the United States. These laws don't do anything to help lessen violent crime. Wayne Lapierre, the CEO of the N.R.A., argues that, "All anti-gun laws do is put the innocent at the mercy of the lawless." In addition, President Barack Obama announced in 2013, "No single law, no set of laws can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act of violence in our society." Even the president of the United States understands that gun laws do not affect violent criminals. Despite this, gun control advocates say the recent shootings prove that the nation's gun laws are too weak. However, nearly all mass shootings have occurred in gun-free zones. This is because violent shooters know that people in gun-free zones are not armed, meaning they don't have an efficient means to protect themselves. For instance, in 1976, Washington D.C. outlawed handguns, even for self-defense in homes. After that, armed crime skyrocketed, earning the nation's capital the shameful nickname, the "Murder Capital." Violent crimes occur the most in places with the toughest gun control laws because, as the article Testimony says, "These laws make easy targets of the sane and law-abiding." All anti-gun laws do is put citizens in danger by disarming them.
It is clear, then, that all Americans have the right to defend themselves. Guns are the most reliable means of defense, and give citizens the ability to protect themselves from violent attackers and fight back without a chance of getting hurt. All anti-gun laws do is take away the protection of citizens by disarming them, putting them in danger. As President Barack Obama said, "No single law, no set of laws can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act of violence in our society." Therefore, society is safer when people carry guns because it gives citizens the ability to protect themselves from violent attacks.
What does defensive firearms training mean to me? The answer is multi-faceted.
Reaction time is key in any life-or-death situation. Being effective at drawing and using a weapon can be the difference between protecting loved ones or a lifetime of regret. Just owning a firearm is a weighty responsibility, but efficiency doesn’t come from ownership. Choosing the proper weapon for a situation is just the first step in proficiency. Knowing when, how, and the degree to react takes familiarity from training. Accuracy and then speed are offspring of practice.
In this modern world, we live a complacent life, rightfully expecting to return home safely each time we step outside. However, nestled in complacency is danger, because most never learn situational awareness. Lack of awareness allows some to wander into confrontations that trained and vigilant people would have avoided.
Training by experienced and knowledgeable instructors helps foster awareness as well as honing abilities to react to any situation and make the proper decision when seconds count.
Using a firearm to defend life and liberty is a right, but it is the responsibility of the user to be ever vigilant and always aware. Defensive training conditions us to evade dangerous situations and react instinctively and effectively when they can’t be avoided. After all, in a life-or-death situation, there is no second-place winner.
As a hunter, I practice year round with my bow, zero in my rifle, shoot trap, hike with my pack loaded down in my new boots, all in preparation for a fantastic fall hunting season. When my good buddy Jason asked if I had taken any classes on home defense, I laughed it off. The point hit home over the next several days. In the back of my mind, I knew he was right.
In any given year, I shoot tons of arrows in the months leading up to archery season, and yet I can count on my fingers the number of times I have shot a pistol or thought about what I would do in a critical situation if I needed to protect myself or my family.
This year my aim is to change all of that, starting with the beginning class that most every gun owner should consider: the concealed-carry class in your home state. These classes are paramount to understanding the laws of your individual state, when and where it is legal to carry, and how you can protect yourself. The next course will be a simple home defense 101 course, and I will look for some guidance from the instructors and friends after I complete those first two courses.
From one hunter to another, I am encouraging as many of you as I can to consider whether you truly are prepared to protect your family in a moment of crisis. Most hunters know how to aim a gun, but using one in the heat of battle is a different matter entirely. Do you think it is worth your time and money to invest in training?
By Kevin Reese
“The more you sweat in peace, the less you bleed in war.” Sun Tzu’s ageless adage, adopted by Marine Corps drill instructors everywhere, still rings true today, and not just a midst ranks of uniformed troops; substitute “war” with “defensive situations” and you’re left with similar common-sense ideology in the civilian world. While practice doesn’t necessarily “make perfect” when operating in survival mode, it certainly does offer a calming of the storm, so to speak, while trapped in its vortex. In this context, training isn’t a function of simply educating. It’s a function of prevention, avoidance or, ultimately, committing survivor tactics to our subconscious – not processing what needs to be done but doing it automatically and without hesitation.
The Liberty Poll had it right when it asked readers, “How many times have you read, ‘An unidentified woman, heavily armed with a semi-automatic weapon, was raped by a man wielding a knife?” The question itself carries a lot of weight unless you qualify it with a lack of training. Let’s face it, lack of defensive knowledge manifested in ineffective subconscious responses has resulted in hundreds of thousands of victimized firearms owners.
“Anything worth doing is worth doing right.” If my Pop said it once, he said it a thousand times. Strangely enough, the most effective ways to reinforce good habits while ending bad ones are training and routine practical application. By and large, concealed handgun license (CHL) holders and other defensive firearms enthusiasts recognize the importance of training and practice.
Unfortunately, even CHL curriculum can lack the level of training necessary to save lives and protect property, since the most critical components of defensive firearms training, situational awareness and critical decision-making, learned only through experience or training (I suggest training), are often lacking. As a result, scores of CHL holders agree that meeting basic permit requirements only marks the beginning of their defensive training.